Citizen of the United States of America vs Citizen of the United states

citizen of the United States of America
vs
citizen of the US

The sovereign is the The United States of America [Articles of Confederation] with 13 sovereign States. The people in reality had only ONE sovereign, being the State of their domicile with LIMITED DELEGATION OF POWER. Then the people [Representatives of the States] decided to divide the LIMITED DELEGATION OF POWER between TWO jurisdictions, being one of the several States AND the United States. For Limited Delegation of Power see Article I section 8 and Amendment 9 and 10 in the Bill of Rights.
Did the United States of America cease to EXIST? Of course not! To exercise a LIMITED DELEGATION OF POWER, you must ALWAYS MAINTAIN THE SOVEREIGN POSITION. The people had the use of succession from the Union to remove their LIMITED DELEGATION OF POWER if the Union didn’t work out and to also keep the Union in check. See the Book Real Lincoln for the exact three states in which this is conclusive:
“As we’ve seen, the Virginia, New York, and Rhode Island state conventions explicitly reserved the right to secede at some future point, and those reservations were accepted by everyone involved. U.S. Senators were elected by state legislatures from 1789 until 1914, during which time the legislatures took for granted their right to instruct their federal representatives how to vote on policy issues.” The Real Lincoln by Thomas J. DiLorenzo, Pgs. 110 and 111

A Republican Form of Government is all Contract Law with LIMITED DELEGATION OF POWER.

An “Office” is to enter into the affairs of another without his permission and against his will. Source Gile Jacobs Law Dictionary 1782 [English] and the reprint in America 1810 [Reprint can be purchased from the Law Book exchange.]

Therefore to have limited delegation of power from the sovereign people, there must be a Constitution (Contract), Limited Delegation of Power (Bill of Rights minimum – securing our inalienable rights) any public officer must have at a minimum of a Oath of Office as a public officer under seal in a public forum AND either a Certificate of Election from the people for elections or a Civil Commission [signature is the appointment] for appointment under seal. See Article VI, See 1 Stat 23, See 1 Stat 73 section 8 and see your state constitutions. Beware of employees having the oath not as public officers- American Jurisprudence on ‘public officers’.

Side note. The reason for the seal is that if done by a Notary or other qualified person is that the Notary validates the public officer’s signature and a SEAL validates the signature of the Notary Public and therefore closes the loop under the authority of an Office. See Source a book on Seal of the United States published by the government. One of the games by the officers [‘ illegals’] is that a judge with no SEAL for his purported Office will validate an Oath and use someone else’s seal, like a phony one of the State that can only be used by the Secretary of State.

1.      The “United States of America” is the sovereign, i.e. the people of original States prior to the Constitution of the United States. See Preamble of all of the several States admitted except the later STATES and they all come in as “one of the United States of America.” See the Preamble of the Constitution of the United States, i.e. “Constitution [of the United States] for the United States of America”
2.      Article II of the Constitution of the United States, i.e. “The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America.” He can’t execute upon the Office until he takes the Oath in Article II as the “President of the United States.
3.      Congress assembles as the United States of America to enact the Laws of the United States. See the enacting clause, i.e. “Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled.” Congress is bound by Article VI and 1 Stat 23.
The exception to this is the North West Ordinance of 1787 which is styled “Be it ordained by the United States assembled.” Obviously this is not a Law of the United States, but an ordinance ordained after they are already assembled.
4.      The “Citizen of the United States” in say Article II is not the same as a “citizen of the United States” in the 14th. The “Citizen” with the capital “C” is a class of “citizens.” The lower class “c” “citizen” applies to one of the people that has standing, i.e. a party to the Contract if you will, being the a particular Constitution with “Privileges and Immunities.”

Therefore, it being established that there is a United States of America, a President of the United States of America and a Congress of the United States of America, there must be a “citizen of the United States of America”!

This citizen of the United States of America is validated in 1 Stat 477 (1796), all naturalization documents from the beginning to present (I have some), and a current document I (Ralph Winterowd) got by hook and crook from Senator Murkowski’s [now governor of Alaska] office for federal senators and their help.

So who is this NEW citizen of the United States in the 14th amendment?

The Supreme’s tell us no new rights were created.

1       This is a citizen to a National legislature and distinct from a state citizen. See Cook v. Gralike, 531 U.S. 510 (2001).
2.      Does the 14th amendment citizen of the United States have FULL ACCESS TO A CONSTITUTION?   NO!
3.      Does the 14th amendment citizen of the United States have FULL ACCESS TO A BILL OF RIGHTS. NO! See Wolf v. People of the State of Colorado, 338 U.S. 25 (1948) talking about only the Bill of Rights of 1-8 being estopped [Law of collateral estople]- which was over ruled by Mapp v. Ohio 367 U.S. 643, (1961) and this decision has now been limited. Are you impressed that in a State criminal forum you now have limited access to the Bill of Rights 1-8 – and there is no access to Bill of Rights 9 and 10 – by the year 1961 and since limited.

4.      Does the 14th amendment citizen of the United States have LIMITED DELEGATION OF POWERS IN SOME CONSTITUTION AND BILL OF RIGHTS? NO!
5.      Does only a 14th amendment citizen of the United States sit in a STATE or FEDERAL JURY. YES! Then if this citizen is only a citizen of this National Legislature, HOW DOES THIS NATIONAL CITIZEN have any standing in a STATE FORUM, STATE CODES, OR STATE LAW? NO!
Talk about jury nullification in a STATE forum. Is State Law enacted by the National Legislature? Of course not, even though only National citizens vote in state elections! Can a National citizen election State citizens for a public office? I would like to have that one explained to me in law. Can a jury of a National Government sit in any capacity in a State. NO!
6.      Is a standalone “citizen of the United States” sovereign. NO! This is creation by amendment and this particular status is under the control of the National Legislature and not the creator of the National Legislature.
7.      If there is no Bill of Rights and Constitution in a State criminal forum and no limited delegation of power – what is going on here? See the bottom of the 14th, “The Congress shall have the power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.”
Notice the word “enforce.” Enforce is to put into execution (executive), to compel obedience to. See Dozier v. City of Gatesville, 51 S.W.2d 1091.
So how can Congress “enforce” this POWER that is UNLIMITED – NOTICE THERE IS NO LIMITED DELEGATION of POWER here. In what forum can congress have UNLIMITED POWER.

The answer is COMMERCE!.

Can it be proven? YES and I will offer just one part of this.

See Cook v. Gralike, 531 U.S. 510 . Pay particular attention to the following:

The principle is that Senators and Representatives in the National Government are responsible to the people who elect them, not to the States in which they reside.

And

The idea of federalism is that a National Legislature enacts laws which bind the people as individuals, not as citizens of a State; and, it follows, freedom is most secure if the people themselves, not the States as intermediaries, hold their federal legislators to account for the conduct of their office.

This National Government has it “citizens.” Every agreement is by contract. In most simple terms, the founding members of this frontier found themselves alone in the frontier lands. And being there any body could state to another “I, am the voice of the one who cries in the wilderness” and ‘I wish to… sell you a horse or borrow your donkey to plough my field, or whatever. Contracts were usually mutually agreed upon by the parties in writing or by verbal agreement and a handshake. Contracts were the beginning elements of our society like those that would build a bridge and keep it up and charge a toll for its’ use. In most simple terms the crux of any civilized world usually involved barter and deals, ergo contracts…having terms and conditions and at times, a date for completion. This was the binding element of any agreement.
To ‘Bind’ is to create an obligation. Is this the purpose of the enacting Laws? Of course not.
How does it bind the people as individuals? By federal created rights (benefits/obligations) and federal created substantive rights (still a benefit/obligation trying to look like a inalienable right for due process).
Who is this individual? This is a taxpayer, being “natural person acting as a business entity.” See Alaska Administrative Code 15.19.900 definitions and Alaska Statute 43.19.110 and the Alaska Income Tax Act
What is the name of this “business entity”? Wouldn’t you like to know? I would.
Entity is a fiction of law. Business is in commerce.
Natural Person is an “entity state” occurring naturally See 23 Va. Cir 352 (1991)

No Comments »

Comments are closed.